How the scores work

Every number on WARNPOINT is derived deterministically from open-source reporting — no black box. This is how the instability scores and the global threat level are built, and what they do and don't mean.

The instability score (0–100)

Each country carries a single 0–100 instability score, updated continuously. It maps to four tiers:

Watch 0–24 Elevated 25–49 Severe 50–74 Critical 75–100

What feeds it

The score fuses two streams into one normalized event model: GDELT geolocated conflict events (precise incident points), and 200+ open RSS/OSINT feeds (wire services, national outlets, defence, cyber, humanitarian and think-tank sources). Both are tagged to countries and scored on the same scale.

How it's weighted — coverage is not instability

A country in 30 trade-and-diplomacy stories is not in crisis; one in 5 airstrike stories may be. So the model:

The global threat level

The single headline number blends signals that actually move: the breadth of genuinely hot states, escalation velocity (per-country momentum from the index history), warning-scenario pressure, and cross-domain convergence (a place lighting up in conflict + disease + displacement at once). It maps to a 1–5 THREATCON dial.

Confidence & trend

Each assessment carries a confidence rating driven by how many independent sources corroborate it and their reliability grades — two wire services outweigh five copies of one outlet. Persisted score history yields a 24h trend and a 72-hour projection with an escalation probability.

Cadence & limits

Signals refresh continuously (about every 15 minutes). This is an open-source intelligence estimate for situational awareness — a model over public reporting, not official confirmation. Reporting gaps, machine-coding noise and source bias all apply; treat scores as a prioritised starting point, not ground truth.

▸ Open the live map